Motorola inc case

The scope of the anti-suit injunction was on only the injunctive remedies that Motorola had obtained in Germany, Motorola inc case Motorola was able to continue litigating its German patent except its granted injunction.

Carry case[ edit ] The Motorola Bag Phone was sold in several types of carry cases "bags"with each model being available with one or two types. The color LCD display utilized the colors orange for the alphanumeric display area red on the Digital Concert Seriesgreen for the power and InUse indicators, red for the NoSvc indicator, and yellow for the Roam indicator.

The battery provides up to 2. Each type of handset Motorola inc case had its own transceiver, marked with a model number beginning with SUN. The earliest bag phones, which used a large transceiver similar to that used in the Tough Talker transportable phone, came in a large upright case, in which the transceiver and battery if applicable sat in the bottom of the case, with the handset and hang-up cup assembly placed on top.

Background[ edit ] Motorola was the holder of patents that were deemed essential to the By reducing the size and weight of the transceiver and battery pack, and introducing more fashionable leather bags in which to contain them, Motorola was able to make them more marketable to the average cellular phone consumer, and hence the Bag Phone.

Random handsets can be used with random transceivers, but some mismatches may result in unusable functions.

As the anti-suit injunction was only meant to stop Microsoft from suffering damages while the case was decided, it was only in effect until a final decision was made and only stopped Motorola from enforcing the injunction from the German patent infringement case.

Additionally, they are backwards compatible with batteries for the original Bag Phones.

Motorola Bag Phone

The contract made no guarantee that any initial offers to license would include RAND terms; however, if Motorola were to offer blatantly unreasonable terms then it would act in bad faith by not wanting to eventually reach RAND terms with its licensees.

The mere fact that different jurisdictions answered the same legal question differently did not generate an intolerable comity problem. Motorola introduced the Bag Phone line in Display[ edit ] Most handsets utilized a monochrome LCD display capable of displaying 7 or 10 digits, with green or orange LED backlighting.

These can be determined by the model number on the underside of the handset, beginning with SCN. Because Microsoft had failed these conditions necessary to be eligible for RAND licensing terms, Motorola claimed that it was not under any obligations to give RAND terms and thus could not have breached any contract.

While the color display was more attractive, it has a few downsides. Litigation still might be "vexatious" even if there were some merit. The court did rule that Motorola was prohibited from further action against Microsoft based on patent infringement related to the All of these parts are put together in a specially designed bag made by either Caseworks, Inc.

Along with the framework, the court held as follows: Microsoft contended that the 2. An incandescent lamp is used for backlighting, which not only draws more power, thus reducing battery life in a portable application, but has a definite lifespan.Buy Motorola Droid Turbo Case - Belt Clip Holster Cover Shell Kickstand Criss Cross Black New Plaid Design, Motorola Droid Turbo XT Holsters - FREE DELIVERY possible on.

Motorola Solutions is a leader in mission-critical communications products, solutions & services for communities & businesses. Learn more! The Motorola Bag Phone is the colloquial name for a line of personal transportable cellular telephones manufactured by Motorola, inc.

from to Buy OtterBox Commuter Series Case for Motorola DROID Mini - Retail Packaging - Black: Basic Cases - FREE DELIVERY possible on eligible purchases.

Microsoft Corp. v.

Motorola Inc., F.3d (9th Cir. ) was a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case about Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (RAND) Licensing and foreign anti-suit injunction. The case was originally filed by Microsoft against Motorola in the Western District Court of Washington at November 9,claiming that Motorola had violated its reasonable.

Motorola inc case
Rated 0/5 based on 12 review